"Someone else's land", or There was a village here … Part 2: Internal political optimization as a way of fragmentation of the state
There are enough methods for pursuing a policy of collapse of states. The most accurate, proven and well-tested technique is manipulating people on their shortages. In any country you can always find someone who will be dissatisfied with the internal politics, economy, ideology of their country …
Part 1
There are enough methods for pursuing a policy of state collapse. The most accurate, proven and well-tested technique is manipulating people on their shortages. In any country you can always find someone who will be dissatisfied with the internal politics, economy, and ideology of their country. In fact, all these grumblers suffer from their own emptiness, caused by the lack of proper, according to their nature, realization.
Russians are not an exception, but rather, on the contrary, being formed on the basis of a unique experience of survival in a difficult landscape, some properties of vectors are not always in demand, which means they are developed.
So, due to the underdevelopment and encapsulation of natural archetypal properties, leather people tend to theft and illegal acquisition of property values. The lack of visual vector among people from the creative environment responsible for culture leads to liberalization and a perverted understanding of "freedom of speech" and an even more perverse understanding of "democratic freedoms".
In the shallow minds of liberal spectators, accustomed to seeing an elephant in a fly, and a tyrant in any ruler, it is easy to sow panic moods, supporting them in a timely manner, tugging at the correct emotion with a certain frequency and force. If an archetypal skin official takes away the state budget and pours money allocated for housing and communal services or agriculture to offshore, weakening the country financially, then ideological undermining should be expected from liberal spectators.
In the plan with the collapse of the Soviet Union, people with an underdeveloped skin vector or with a visual fear of the Western olfactory measure were assigned a special role. It so happened that both of them, not always realizing this to themselves, were actively involved in the restructuring, redrawing, firefight and rearrangement of the state.
The "mission" of the liberal spectators was to re-distort the ideology, to erase the elite Soviet culture worked out by the working Soviet five-year plans, battle-hardened and refined by socialist realism.
Formed with Western money, the "fifth column" under the flags of democracy and pluralism began to condemn all the former merits of Russian heroes, to plant their dubious idols on the vacant pedestals, to pour muddy rivers of lies and fiction, well-spiced from abroad by the "green". The task was to systematically and stubbornly undermine the state foundations and moral and ethical principles, to impose on the Russians a complex of inferiority and grave guilt of the Russian people before the whole world and other nationalities.
The message of the skin archetype was that, having penetrated into the structures of power, corrupted it, seized upon the state treasury or national treasures in the form of minerals, grab as much as possible, sending all the goods stolen by “overwork” to offshore and overseas banks.
Urban leather workers with a lower status were engaged in petty robberies or protection, connecting to the process the muscles, which were subject to their natural skin influence. So, in the cities gangs were formed and brothers appeared, at the head of which were archetypal urethralists or skinners who imitated them in everything.
Who drinks the village
People with a skin vector, who found themselves at an even lower stage of development, in a state of archetype, unable to adapt the complex landscape and settle down in the city, remained in the village. The reluctance, inability to work, the craving of the archetypal skin for theft and the fear of being caught stealing put the skinner in a state of extreme stress, which can only be relieved by alcohol. The village skin drunkard who lives among the muscular population manages to easily drink it.
People with a muscle vector always take the lead form. If he turns out to be a developed urethral, the muscular army follows him to heroic victory and glory, the archetypal leatherman leads him to alcoholization, causing irreparable damage to the Russian peasant.
The paradox is that, by their very nature, muscles are not drunkards. But they become them, "thanks" to people with archetypal properties of the skin vector. Muscularists have a special trust in leather workers, brought up on ancient programs of subordination and ranking. Skin "miner commanders", the middle link between the leader and the soldiers, led the army into battle - to rob other people's caves or to hunt for food for the entire pack. When a leatherman does not have a worthy goal, his campaigns are reduced to the extraction of cheap swill and ends under a fence after drinking in the company of muscles - until delirium tremens.
Today we continue to observe the soldering of the muscle population - the basis of the Russian demographic foundation. The destruction of muscles inevitably leads to a reduction in the number of people with other vectors, since the percentage always remains unchanged. Especially dangerous in this regard is the lack of people with upper vectors - sound, visual, oral, olfactory, that is, those categories whose mental as a whole is capable of setting the direction in the future. It is about the ability to cultural and spiritual development, to political and state activities aimed at the preservation and prosperity of the state and people, to ensure the future of the entire planet.
Given our collectivist mentality and a single natural landscape given from birth, we can say that this applies not only to Russian villages. If you look at how muscles live in other former republics of the USSR, the picture is disappointing and not much different from Russian reality. In all today independent states there is a collapse of the national economy, ruined lands, destroyed enterprises and the soldering of rural workers and workers.
Russia has always been an agrarian country. Even after the launch of the first cosmonaut into space, it still remained more of an agricultural power, capable of feeding itself and others. The Russian peasantry is mainly people with a muscle vector. Their natural task is to sow and reap. All stages of development in a landscape of little use for survival that a Russian village has gone through over the centuries, including the twentieth century, would have been insurmountable without the properties and characteristics of our people with a unique urethral-muscular mentality.
Any attempts by today's analysts to inform the world that the Russian peasantry was destroyed by the Bolsheviks and subsequent collectivization has no right to exist. Of course, in the 20s and 30s, tough measures were taken, which entailed great changes in the peasant life and took many human lives, but if it were not for dispossession and further unification of the rural poor in collective farms, the country would not have survived, would not have fed. Who would then need the freedoms won, and with them the nationalized land.
Continue reading:
Part 3: "Symbiosis" of the working class and the peasantry
